Loyalty Programs

Why your loyalty tiers are quietly alienating best customers and how to redesign them with rfm

Why your loyalty tiers are quietly alienating best customers and how to redesign them with rfm

I used to think tiers were the simplest, most obvious way to make a loyalty programme feel premium: name a few levels, set spend thresholds, slap on some benefits and call it a day. After years of building and auditing programmes for SMEs, I’ve learned that tiers often do the opposite of what they promise. They quietly alienate your best customers — the ones who actually deliver most of the value — and frustrate everyone else.

What usually goes wrong is not the idea of tiers, but how they're designed and measured. Too many programmes judge members by a single metric (total spend), ignore behavioural nuance, and reward vanity metrics rather than sustainable value. If you want tiers that motivate the right behaviours and keep your top customers feeling recognised, you need to design them around behaviour — and there’s no simpler, more pragmatic framework for that than RFM (Recency, Frequency, Monetary).

Why traditional tier models push your best customers away

Here are the mistakes I see most often when I audit programmes:

  • Thresholds based only on lifetime or annual spend. A one-size-fits-all spend target assumes every high spender behaves the same. It ignores whether they still shop with you, or whether they binge and then disappear.
  • Rewards that aren't relevant to the customer. Giving early access to sales or free shipping to a frequent buyer who values experiences or pro-level service is a missed opportunity.
  • No recognition for frequency or recency. Someone who buys small items weekly is often more valuable than a single large purchase once a year, but tiers often fail to reflect that.
  • Hard to reach, easy to lose tiers. If upgrades are based on a big one-off purchase, members gain a status they don’t feel connected to and quickly churn once the novelty fades.
  • Benefit leakage and poor fulfilment. Ambiguous benefits or complex redemption make a tier feel worthless — and your best customers notice.

Put simply: a tier that celebrates a single expensive purchase but ignores the customer's ongoing behaviour might reward someone who will never return. And your truly loyal customers — frequent, recent, and consistent buyers — get marginalised.

Why RFM fixes these problems

RFM is elegant because it captures three dimensions of behaviour that matter for value and loyalty:

  • Recency — How long since a customer’s last purchase? Recent buyers are more likely to respond to offers and maintain engagement.
  • Frequency — How often does the customer buy? Repeated engagement signals habit and relationship, not one-off need.
  • Monetary — How much does the customer spend? This captures value but should be contextualised with recency and frequency.

Using RFM to design tiers helps you separate one-off big spenders from sustainably valuable customers, tailor benefits to real behaviour, and set rules that encourage desired actions (repeat purchase, shorter re‑purchase window, higher basket regularly).

How I redesign tiers using RFM — a practical playbook

I use a step-by-step process that’s data-light enough for teams without big analytics teams, but rigorous enough to produce meaningful changes.

  • Step 1 — Score your customers quickly. Create an RFM score for every customer: assign 1–5 for recency (most recent = 5), frequency (most frequent = 5) and monetary (highest spend = 5). Sum or concatenate for a 3-digit RFM tag (e.g. 5-4-3).
  • Step 2 — Visualise and prioritise segments. Pull distribution counts for RFM combinations. Identify the clusters that represent your best long-term customers (high R & F, high or medium M), one-off big spenders (low R, low F, high M), and lapsing customers (low R, medium F).
  • Step 3 — Map RFM archetypes to tier logic. Define what each tier must represent behaviourally (not just a spend number). For example: “Champion” = R≥4, F≥4; “Engaged” = R≥3, F≥2; “Transactional” = M≥4 but R≤2.
  • Step 4 — Design benefits tied to behaviour. Choose benefits that reinforce the behaviours you want: frequency rewards (exclusive weekly flash offers) for high F, reactivation incentives (personalised vouchers) for low R, exclusive experiences for high R & F customers.
  • Step 5 — Set transparent, measurable rules. Decide whether tiers are based on trailing 12 months, rolling 365 days, or a points system that combines RFM signals. Make the rules clear to members and easy for your ops team to execute.
  • Step 6 — A/B test and measure. Split test different benefit structures for a sample of each RFM segment and track uplift in retention, repeat purchase rate and LTV. Iterate from there.

Example tier map using RFM

Below is a compact table I often build to communicate the logic to stakeholders. It’s intentionally simple — clarity beats complexity when you’re trying to change behaviour.

RFM archetype Typical profile Assigned tier Priority benefits
Champions (R4-5, F4-5, M3-5) Buy frequently and recently; moderate-high spend Platinum Priority support, exclusive experiences, early product drops
Engaged (R3-4, F2-3, M2-4) Regular buyers, may be seasonally active Gold Frequency bonuses, member-only promotions, loyalty points boost
Transactional (R1-3, F1-2, M4-5) High spenders but infrequent/recently lapsed Silver High-value one-off offers, personalised reactivation campaigns
At-risk & New (R1-2, F1, M1-2) New customers or lapsed low spenders Bronze Onboarding incentives, cadence-driven nurture emails

Design tips that actually move the needle

  • Make benefits experiential and exclusive, not just discounts. I’ve seen brands increase frequency by offering small experiential rewards (invites, expert Q&As, free tailoring) where discounts would have trained price sensitivity.
  • Use points as a behavioural glue. If you use a points currency, structure earnings to favour frequent purchases (points per visit, not just per pound).
  • Be aggressive about recency triggers. A small, personalised incentive within 14–30 days of a first purchase can convert new buyers into engaged customers — track and test timing.
  • Communicate tier movement clearly. Tell members how far they are from the next tier and what behaviour will get them there — and send reminders if they’re slipping.
  • Protect your economics with caps and expirations. Reward sustainable behaviour but avoid open-ended perks that erode margin. Time-limited benefits and one-off experiential rewards help.

How I measure success after a tier redesign

After we launch, I monitor a few KPIs weekly and monthly:

  • Repeat purchase rate by RFM segment
  • Churn/retention rate for tiered members vs control
  • Average order value and frequency uplift
  • Upgrades and downgrades — how easy is it to move between tiers?
  • Cost-to-serve versus incremental revenue per tier

Those metrics tell you whether tiers are attracting and retaining the customers you intended, and whether benefits are delivering incremental behaviour or simply rewarding what would have happened anyway.

Redesigning tiers using RFM isn't a one-off project: it's a way to make tiers responsive to real behaviour. When I help teams implement this, the feedback I hear most is that members finally feel recognised for their ongoing relationship — not for a single lucky purchase. That feeling, translated into repeat action, is where the value of a loyalty programme actually lives.

You should also check the following news:

How to measure incremental revenue from gamified loyalty features on shopify without tracking hacks
Data & Analytics

How to measure incremental revenue from gamified loyalty features on shopify without tracking hacks

When I work with SMEs to add gamified loyalty features on Shopify — streaks, progress bars,...

Feb 13 Read more...