Loyalty Programs

When to integrate a third-party loyalty platform vs building your own — a decision matrix for SMEs

When to integrate a third-party loyalty platform vs building your own — a decision matrix for SMEs

I get asked all the time by founders and marketing teams whether they should build their own loyalty program or buy a third‑party platform. The right choice isn’t binary — it depends on your stage, technical capacity, budget and the behaviours you actually want to drive. Over the years I’ve audited dozens of programmes and implemented both home‑grown solutions and off‑the‑shelf platforms. In this post I’ll walk you through a practical decision matrix I use with SMEs, the trade‑offs to weigh, and pragmatic red flags that usually point one way or the other.

Why the question matters

Loyalty programmes sit at the intersection of customer experience, technology and finance. Pick the wrong route and you’ll waste budget on development or struggle with slow rollouts and poor measurement. Pick the right one and you’ll accelerate retention, create measurable LTV uplift and run campaigns that actually move the needle.

My approach is simple: start with the outcome (what behaviours do you want to change?), map the capabilities required to achieve it, and then match those capabilities against internal capacity, time to market and cost. Below I give a decision matrix and practical examples so you can decide quickly.

The core questions to ask first

  • What specific customer behaviour do we want to change? (e.g. increase purchase frequency, raise AOV, reduce churn)
  • How many customers/members do we expect in year 1? (scale matters)
  • What data and integrations are non‑negotiable? (e.g. POS, ecommerce platform, CRM, email)
  • What internal tech and product resources do we have? (developers, data analysts, QA)
  • What budget and time constraints exist for launch and iteration?
  • Answering these usually separates “must‑have” features from “nice‑to‑haves,” which is a pivotal step toward the right decision.

    The decision matrix

    Below is a simplified matrix I use in workshops. It’s not exhaustive but covers the main drivers and when each option typically wins.

    Key factor Build (in‑house) Buy (third‑party platform)
    Time to market Slow (months to build and test) Fast (days to weeks for basic setup)
    Cost profile High upfront dev cost; lower recurring license Lower initial cost; predictable SaaS fees
    Customisation High control; bespoke UX and logic Limited to platform capabilities; some customisation via APIs
    Maintenance Internal ongoing burden Vendor handles platform updates and compliance
    Integrations Fully custom but requires dev effort Many prebuilt connectors for Shopify, Magento, POS, CRMs
    Analytics & reporting Flexible if you build it well; requires analytics skills Often strong out‑of‑the‑box dashboards; exportable data
    Compliance & security You manage it (GDPR, PCI, data retention) Vendor typically manages security & compliance

    When I usually recommend buying

    I recommend a third‑party platform in most SME cases. Here are the common scenarios where buying is the pragmatic choice:

  • You need to launch quickly and show results: If you want members in 30–90 days, buying is nearly always faster.
  • Limited internal engineering capacity: If your dev team is focused on product features that drive revenue, offload the loyalty platform.
  • Multiple, standard integrations required: If you use popular ecommerce or POS systems, many platforms have plug‑and‑play connectors that save weeks of work.
  • Budget predictability and lower initial spend: SaaS pricing makes it easier to justify and measure ROI, especially when you’re testing hypotheses.
  • Compliance appetite is low: If you don’t want to manage GDPR, security patches or PCI implications, a vendor reduces that risk.
  • Platforms I’ve worked with or audited often cited by SMEs include LoyaltyLion, Yotpo Loyalty, LoyaltyLion, Smile.io, and Annex Cloud. They differ in depth and price — pick one that matches your scale and use cases.

    When I recommend building

    There are valid reasons to build, but they’re narrower:

  • You truly need unique mechanics that off‑the‑shelf systems can’t support (complex B2B rebates, cross‑brand settlement, or unusual point economics).
  • You have strong engineering resources and a long‑term roadmap where the loyalty logic will be a strategic product differentiator.
  • You expect to scale to very large membership bases where SaaS licensing becomes materially more expensive than owning the stack.
  • You already have robust analytics and data infrastructure and prefer to keep everything within your platform for single‑source reporting.
  • Even then, I recommend a staged approach: prototype with a third‑party tool or a simple rule engine in your CRM so you can validate assumptions before committing to large development work.

    Practical hybrid options (common and often underrated)

    You don’t have to choose exclusively. Some SMEs go hybrid and get the best of both worlds:

  • Use a third‑party platform for customer‑facing features (points, rewards catalog, referral widgets) and sync key events to your data warehouse for custom analytics and attribution.
  • Build custom loyalty logic in your backend but use a vendor for front‑end widgets and OOTB integrations.
  • Start with SaaS to test mechanics and, after 12–18 months of clear ROI and predictable scale, plan a migration with learnings already validated.
  • Checklist: quick diagnostic to help decide

    Run through these statements and count your “yes” answers. More yeses in A means buy; more yeses in B suggests build.

    A: Buy B: Build
    We need to launch fast Yes
    We have limited dev capacity Yes
    We require highly bespoke reward mechanics Yes
    We need standard integrations (Shopify/POS/CRM) Yes
    We already run complex customer analytics in‑house Yes
    We can tolerate SaaS fees long term Yes

    Measurement and migration considerations

    Whichever path you take, make measurement non‑negotiable. Define a small set of KPIs before launch: member activation rate, redemption rate, change in purchase frequency, and incremental LTV. For many SMEs, a basic cohort LTV analysis before and after launch is enough to evaluate impact.

    If you buy first, build your data export and retention strategy into the contract. You’ll want full event dumps (member activity, redemptions, balances) so you can run accurate attribution or migrate later if needed. If you build, plan for vendor‑grade logging and a way to export schema to avoid vendor lock‑in later on.

    My favourite pragmatic play

    For most small teams I advise: start with a third‑party platform, run a 6–12 month learning program, and only consider building if you’ve proven value and identified specific technical blockers that can’t be solved by an integration or customisation. This approach reduces risk, conserves cash in the early revenue stage, and gives you the behavioural data you need to design a truly differentiated long‑term solution.

    If you want, I can help you run a short diagnostic for your business and map the fastest testable route. I often work with teams to set up an initial SaaS stack, define KPIs, and create a migration playbook should you outgrow the platform. Drop me a note via the contact page on Zynrewards Co and we’ll walk through it together.

    You should also check the following news:

    Case study: scaling a loyalty program from 200 to 5,000 members with email automation
    Case Studies

    Case study: scaling a loyalty program from 200 to 5,000 members with email automation

    I inherited a small, underused loyalty programme from a client: 200 members, low engagement, no...

    Dec 02 Read more...
    How to create a loyalty dashboard in Google Data Studio that execs will actually read
    Data & Analytics

    How to create a loyalty dashboard in Google Data Studio that execs will actually read

    When I’m asked to audit a loyalty programme the first thing I do is open the metrics — but the...

    Dec 02 Read more...